Analysis of a television, online or radio talk show argument Essay

Analysis of a television, online or radio talk show argument - test ExampleThe main argument of the pro-group is that the issue of same sex marriage has been tarnished by lies and black propaganda. The confrontation camp responds with a religious nuanceGod only allowed a marital union mingled with opposite sex, and it is a sin to do otherwise.There are three components of ancestrythe involve, the support, and the warrant. The claim is the argumentations component that responds to the issues. A claim can be categorized into three claims of frame of nominateence _or_ system of government, claims of value, and claims of fact (Phillips & Bostian 239). The claim of form _or_ system of government is a form of claim that stresses the enforcement of a specific policy thinking that the specific policy will be able to resolve a specific issue. In this talk show, the claim of policy is a policy supporting same sex marriage, like that in California. According to the pro-camp, policies g uaranteeing the rights of homosexuals are ought to be constitutionally justifiable for they safeguard human equality. On the other hand, the anti-camp believes that such policies will only push undermine the already threatened institution of marriage.The claim of fact is the form of claim that emphasizes that a special(prenominal) situation has confirmed to have existed, remains existent, or will continue to exist. The claim of the pro-camp is that discrimination against gays and lesbians has existed, palliate existing, and will continue to exist if the right to marry is denied to them. On the other hand, the claim of value is the form of assertion that is regarded as an effort to show that a specific issue is less favorable or more favorable than the others. The anti-camp claims that it is immoral or a sin to allow same sex marriage. They refer to the Bible or religious teachings to support this claim.The support of both the pro- and anti-camp is strong. The pro-camp uses legal, scientific, and practical evidence, whereas the anti-camp uses religious, cultural, and societal values. Lastly, the warrant